bikeToronto Logo  
Home
Contact
About
Links
Comment

Vote 2006
Queen's Quay Plan goes to Executive Committee June 2nd, 2009

Not logged in  log in

Posted to Toronto Waterfront by: Martin Koob on Sunday, May 31, 2009 @ 7:57 am
Update to:
Plans for Continuous Waterfront Trail along Queen's Quay could fall short. Posted: Mar-29-09


The Environmental Study Report on the Queen's Quay revitalization plan goes to the City of Toronto's Executive Committee on June 2nd, 2009 for their approval. Queens Quay Revitilization Environmental Assesment StudyThis is a significant step towards seeing Toronto's central waterfront revitalized and Toronto's signature bicycle path, the Martin Goodman Trail, finally connected through the down town. A continuous Martin Goodman Trail was one of the key goals of the plan. The benefit of this was experienced first hand by Toronto residents when the city unveiled the prototype value was seen in the Quay to the City event in August 2006. A temporary continuous Martin Goodman Trail was created along with a pedestrian promenade and Torontonians flocked to it. A 600% increase in cycling traffic was documented in the area. That initial public support continued as the proposal wound its way through the consultation process conducted by Waterfront Toronto. Thanks to that support the recommended design that is being put forward to the Executive Committee includes the expanded pedestrian areas and a separated Martin Goodman Trail for most of the length of Queen's Quay. This is a significant step foward in seeing a continuous Martin Goodman Trail from the beaches to the Humber and beyond but at the moment it is a step not quite far enough. This week is an opportunity to press the members of the Executive committee to go the distance.

The one concern with the plan being submitted is that it falls 600m short of its goal to have a continuous Martin Goodman Trail through the central waterfront. In the proposed plan the Martin Goodman trail will only be incorporated on Queen's east of Spadina Avenue. For the section between Spadina and Bathurst cyclists will be routed onto the existing bike lanes which are along side the existing traffic lanes. For westbound cyclists that means crossing to the north side of the street at Spadina and Queen's Quay and then crossing Spadina to the bike lane. This also precludes making a separated trail on the section between Bathurst and Stadium Road where the existing bike lanes are continually occupied by parked cars.

Martin Goodman Trail Queen's Quay Toronto
This diagram from the recommended design shows the intersection that Westbound cyclists will have to cross to continue their journey. I have indicated the bike lanes and MGT in orange. You can see all pages of the recommended design at the following link Queen's Quay Recommended Design
(Click the image to see a larger version.).

The above plan does not show how cyclists will have to make the double crossing to move through the intersection. There will have to be a clumsy workaround to try and ensure they can navigate the traffic lanes and streetcar tracks safely. This will be an obstacle that will inconvenience experienced cyclists but it may be a barrier to less experienced cyclists and families cycling with children. The goal of waterfront revitalization should be to make a waterfront accessible to all. The continuous Martin Goodman Trail is one of the priorities in the waterfront plan that helps to realize that goal. A separated Martin Goodman Trail continued between Spadina and Bathurst and then on to Stadium Road to join up with the existing Martin Goodman Trail should be in the final plan.

If the design for Spadina to Bathurst stays as it is, it will be a part of the waterfront the City will have to draw a curtain around when showcasing Toronto's waterfront to the world. It will have to couch its descriptions of its new waterfront, 'Martin Goodman Trail, Toronto's quasi-continuous waterfront trail'. Toronto's Bold Moves on the waterfront should not become a series of half-hearted half-measures done half-assed. The plan being proposed up to Spadina is a bold move that will be something that Toronto residents will truly be proud of. The Executive Committee should press to take the final step and ensure the final section of this plan is included in that bold move. You can let your opinion be know by making a deputation in person or in writing and by writing to the Mayor and members of the Committee. You can find all of the contact information at the following page Toronto City Council - Executive Committee.

Martin Koob
Article Comments:
It took me a while to figure out what was going wrong here. If this design were to go into practice I could see a ton of wrong way cyclists heading westbound on the south side.
  Posted by: Eightlines on 31-May-2009 at 2:27 pm

What were the motivations for their not completing the trail from Spadina through Bathurst? It would be helpful to understand why they made this decision before contacting them.
  Posted by: robonwheels on 01-Jun-2009 at 8:16 am

The stated rationale for not proceeding is that to have a two way traffic lane and a separated Martin Goodman Trail the street car tracks would have to be reconstructed. They don't want to do this as the streetcar tracks in that area were reconstructed in 2001 and they are only half way through their life span. They say it is an issue of timing and that the continuous Martin Goodman trail would have to wait for the street reconstruction at some future point. There is another option. Do the continuous Martin Goodman Trail now and the east bound lane added later. Change the proposed design to have the area south of the tracks used for the two way Martin Goodman Trail and the improved pedestrian promenade now, and then when the streetcar tracks are reconstructed the eastbound lane could be added if needed. There is not that much traffic that needs to go eastbound from Spadina to Bathurst.
  Posted by: Martin Koob on 01-Jun-2009 at 10:08 am

If I understand you correctly - are you proposing it should, at least for some years, be one-way for car traffic (westbound only) through that stretch?
  Posted by: robonwheels on 01-Jun-2009 at 11:24 am