TCAT Election Survey Logo 
Ward 13 - Parkdale-High Park Candidates

Survey Posted:
Linda Coltman
David Garrick
Greg Hamara
Aleksander Oniszczak
Bill Saundercook
Frances Wdowczyk


Not Returned:


Not Sent:

Other Wards

Candidate: Aleksander Oniszczak
Office: councillor
Ward: 13 - Parkdale-High Park
Campaign Phone: 416-831-6747
Website: www.oniszczak.com
Email: aleksander@oniszczak.com

Survey Results

Active Transportation

1. Increasing the role of walking and cycling in Toronto

Walking and cycling (Active Transportation) are the most affordable, healthy and sustainable forms of transportation. In order to seriously tackle the problems of smog, local greenhouse gas emissions, increasing traffic congestion and volatile gas prices, Toronto City Council needs to actively support programs and infrastructure changes that encourage walking and cycling.

Do you support increasing the role of walking and cycling in Toronto’s transportation system through improved programs and infrastructure?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: As a cycling enthusiast and avid walker myself I know the benefits first hand. Not only is it healthy and efficient, it reduces the number of cars on the road benefiting everyone.
 

2. Integrating cycling and pedestrian issues into city planning: road reconstruction & resurfacing

The most cost effective way of building bike lanes and adding pedestrian friendly features to roads is to do it when roads are reconstructed or resurfaced. Toronto spends millions of dollars every year reconstructing and resurfacing roads and most of these are done without making changes to the cycling and pedestrian environment. This is a missed opportunity. Every road reconstruction and resurfacing project and new road construction should incorporate design features that will improve conditions for cyclists and pedestrians.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Road Reconstruction

Do you support a new process that will review road reconstruction and resurfacing projects, as well as development plans, to ensure that they include improvements to the active transportation infrastructure?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I not only strongly support the review road reconstruction and resurfacing projects, as well as development plans, to ensure that they include improvements to the active transportation infrastructure, I actively have lobbied mayor Miller on just such a plan (as can be seen at: http://www.oniszczak.com/index.html#1). Instead of simply repainting a line on the road every time reconstruction is done as seen here: http://www.torontocat.ca/TCAT Home_files/DSC01092.jpg, I suggest we rebuild with a raised bike trail as seen here: http://www.oniszczak.com/photos/raised_bike_lane_small.jpg in a similar photo I took while visiting Amsterdam. Rebuilding bike lanes at the same level as the sidewalk rather than the street has many benefits while taking up the same amount of space and costing about the same amount of money. Motor vehicles will not cut into raised bicycle lanes while passing and they will not park or stand on them since they are at sidewalk level. The idea has been proven successful in many cities around the world. This will also greatly reduce the needless conflict between driver and cyclist as the design reduces possibilities for conflicts. And more importantly, it will increase safety and increase bicycle awareness benefiting everyone.
 

3. Increasing the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business

As the City of Toronto calls on its residents to make the transition to Active Transportation it should lead by example by incorporating cycling and walking into the delivery of its services. It could do this by: a) having more staff use bikes in the course of their duties such as bylaw officers, parking enforcement officers, police and other city employees b) using more bicycle and foot couriers c) improving bicycle parking facilities at city buildings to encourage staff to bike to work and residents to bike to access city programs and services.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Lead - Increase the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business

Do you support increasing the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business and to access city programs and services?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Leading by example is indeed very important for ideas to be taken seriously. I plan to do my part by continuing to use my bike as part of my routine. I would certainly encourage my colleagues at City Hall to do the same. Improving bicycle parking facilities at city buildings is a great way not only setting an example, but to actually make it a viable option for city staff. I strongly support this measure.
 

4. Exploring the creation of ‘Clean Air Corridors’ during smog days

Toronto is suffering from an unacceptable number of smog days during which the air is dangerously polluted, and Toronto Public Health reports that motorized transportation sources are a major local source of air pollution. Cities around the world have started to experiment with closing streets to motorized traffic on days when their air quality deteriorates. The City of Toronto should begin a study of the feasibility and potential positive health impact of instituting "clean air corridors" in Toronto on smog days, streets where motorized vehicles are restricted in order to provide citizens with travel routes where the air is cleaner and safer to breathe.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Protect - Explore ‘Creation of Clean Air Corridors’

Do you support directing Toronto Public Health and Transportation Services to investigate the health benefits and potential routes for clean air corridors?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: There is no more important issue than the health and welfare of the city’s citizens. On this basis I support directing Toronto Public Health and Transportation Services to investigate the health benefits and potential routes for clean air corridors. Clean air and water should be every citizen’s right. Also support closing streets to motorized traffic on days when their air quality deteriorates as it reminds citizens of the seriousness of the situation as well as actually helping improve it.
 

Walking

5. Developing the Pedestrian Master Plan

The city of Toronto has embarked a Pedestrian Master Plan to be developed by 2008. Ideally, this plan should address the pedestrian-related work of all city departments, and provide an ambitious, groundbreaking and detailed blueprint for creating a city that is a joy to walk in throughout its length and breadth.
More info: TCAT platform – Lead – “Pedestrian Plan”

Do you support the development of a Pedestrian Master Plan for the City of Toronto?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I not only support the development of a Pedestrian Master Plan for the City of Toronto, I advocate the creation of pedestrian streets as part of my platform: http://www.oniszczak.com/index.html#9. Many great cities around the world have pedestrian streets where people can walk leisurely down and stop and restaurants, shops and cafes. What is stopping us? Not even a harsh and cold winter stopped Ottawa from having a successful pedestrian street and so can we. There are many more ideas we can successfully implement with little cost to make Toronto an even greater place to live.
 

6. Coordinating pedestrian issues across divisions

Pedestrians are affected by and affect the work of almost all branches of the city government: Transportation, Planning, Parks and Forestry, Health, Licensing and Standards, Police Services, the TTC, social housing, culture, and tourism. Yet there currently exists no mechanism for coordinating the pedestrian-related work of these various divisions, which means that moving forward any kind of complex pedestrian initiative is very difficult. The city needs to establish a strong sys-tem for coordinating and leading pedestrian initiatives across city divisions.
More info: TCAT platform – Lead – “Pedestrian Plan”

Do you support the creation of a mechanism for coordinating pedestrian issues across City divisions?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: This is a great idea. Not only must we evaluate all proposals for change with how it affects pedestrians, cyclists, transit passengers and motorists, but we must coordinate plans so that they are not at odds with each other. The whole can be greater than the sum of its parts if they are viewed as a whole throughout the process. If we coordinate the building of bicycle lanes with the rebuilding of sidewalks, for example, we benefit from the synergy. If we do not coordinate, we will have conflicts between the two which is in no one’s best interest. Coordination is key.
 

7. Establishing and enforcing pedestrian clearways

Sidewalks are often blocked by a wide variety of obstacles that impede pedestrians. Often, these obstacles are placed in such a way that, between them, they leave little space for pedestrians to pass. These obstacles can include A-frame advertising boards, street patios, transit shelters and other street furniture. Such blockages are in contravention of the city’s accessibility guidelines, and often in contravention of bylaws, which are not enforced. The Harbord Village Resident’s Association has proposed a “clearway” concept where street furniture would be placed in such a way to allow an accessible, clear passage for pedestrians, and that bylaws governing sidewalk obstacles would be systematically enforced.
More info: TCAT Platform – Protect – “Improve bylaw enforcement”

Do you support the establishment of “clearways” for pedestrians on sidewalks?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I have experienced such blockages on the sidewalk myself and I agree that there is no need for a double standard when it comes to sidewalks as compared with how we deal with blockages on the road. Do we as a society believe those in cars to be more important than those in wheelchairs? Then why do we accept the expense of towing obstructing motor vehicles from the roads and shrug when the tail end of a parked car blocks a sidewalk? Perhaps if we all had to be wheelchair bound for a day we would see things differently. However, this is the type of issue responsible municipal governments should be tending to. I strongly support this measure.
 

8. Improving pedestrian crosswalks

The city has developed a Crosswalk Improvement Program to make crosswalks on major and minor arterial roads safer, and convert dangerous ones into traffic signals. The combined cost of major and minor arterials will be $10.2 million dollars over four years.
More info: City of Toronto – Pedestrian Crossover Review Proposal (Major Arterials) (PDF) and City of Toronto – Pedestrian Crossover Review (Minor Arterials) (PDF)

Do you support the completion of the Crosswalk Improvement Program within four years?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I support measures that protect the health and safety of our citizens. Almost everyone is a pedestrian at one time or other even if it is only to cross the street from one’s parking space. But it only takes being hit by a car once to appreciate pedestrian safety measures. It’s a matter of life and death. If studies show that painting crosswalks like the “zebra crossings” in England makes the less well marked crosswalks we are used to in Toronto safer, then we must do so. Health and safety should be a basic expectation of living in Toronto.
 

9. Maintaining sidewalks to an adequate standard

Sidewalk maintenance in Toronto has fallen far behind schedule because of budget cuts. Crumbling sidewalks are not just an issue of aesthetics – they reduce accessibility, are a danger to public health, and discourage walking as a form of transportation. The city needs to direct the necessary budgetary resources to sidewalk maintenance to get it back on a reasonable schedule.
More info: TCAT Platform – Integrate – “Improve maintenance”

Do you support directing additional budgetary resources to eliminate the backlog in sidewalk maintenance?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Obviously there is a problem in the system if after every winter concrete sidewalks crumble. Either they are not being built correctly, or the whole premise that building sidewalks out of concrete in our climate is appropriate. For example, I have noticed that the plastic boardwalks along the western lakeshore are holding out quite remarkably after many years. They seem to be as good as new and look great. In fact, most people assume they are made of wooden planks but in fact they weather much better. Perhaps we should experiment with a similar material for our sidewalks. While I’m not an expert in the field, I do know that progress will not happen if we just keep throwing money at rebuilding things to previously proven inappropriate standards. We wouldn’t accept the walls of our homes to crumble after each winter, so why do we accept disposable sidewalks? If we build them right, we can put the money saved into more useful endeavors for our citizens.
 

10. Increasing the funding of the Civic Improvement Program

The Civic Improvement Program, managed by the Urban Design Group of Planning, makes significant and visible improvements to the pedestrian environment by expanding, designing and beautifying public spaces. Unfortunately, because its funding is limited, it can only work on a fraction of the potential projects it identifies. If the city is to achieve its goal of becoming a beautiful city that draws pedestrians onto its streets, the work of the Civic Improvement Program must be greatly expanded. TCAT recommends increasing the budget by $400,000 a year over four years, allowing the program to work on two additional projects a year.
More info: City of Toronto – Civic Improvement Program

Do you support increasing the budget of the Civic Improvement Program by $400,000 a year over four years?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I believe a properly funded Civic Improvement Program will improve tourism and benefit all citizens that live in the midst of improved public spaces. There are many identifiable ways in which spending can be successfully reduced as I have commented upon in the previous question. This money would be well spent on the civic improvement program so that there can be tangible results of responsible spending. Toronto should be beloved as Paris is in France. Why should our goals be anything less?
 

11. Increasing pedestrian unit staffing

The Transportation Division currently only devotes one full-time staff position and half of a managerial position to pedestrians. As a result, those pedestrian initiatives that the city begins are often delayed for years in their execution because of a lack of available staff time and expertise. If Toronto is to make walking an essential part of its transportation policy, as indicated in the official plan and envisaged in the Pedestrian Plan project, then it must provide the requisite staff resources.
More info: TCAT platform – Build – “Increase staff resources”

Do you support increasing the number of full-time staff positions dedicated to pedestrian projects?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: As I have indicated above, I identify pedestrian issues as important to the well being of our city and support measures necessary in fulfilling that goal.
 

Cycling

12. Streamlining the Bike Lane Approval Process

One of the issues holding up the construction of the Bikeway Network is the lack of an effective bike lane approval process. In 2005 only 1 km of bike lane was built even thought 16 km were proposed. In 2006 only 6 km of the 30 km of funded projects were approved. Councillor support is crucial to ensure bike lanes are built in the year that they are proposed for construction by city staff. Councillors need to expedite the bike lane approval process by consulting with all stakeholders in a timely manner and still ensuring bike lanes go through the Council approvals without delay.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Bike lane approval process

Do you support a new streamlined bike lane approval process that will ensure bike lanes are constructed in the year proposed for their implementation by city staff?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Yes, I certainly do. And when coupled with genuine improvements in the look of streets upgraded to raised bicycle lanes (http://www.oniszczak.com/index.html#1) I believe that the citizens will get behind plans that revitalize the look of their neighbourhoods which will further expedite the process.
 

13. Building links between cycling and transit

Active transportation is crucial link in any public transit system. If people can't comfortably and safely walk or cycle to the bus or subway they won't take public transit. Combining cycling and transit can increase ridership by making transit more accessible and effective for people giving them door-to-door convenience. This can be done by funding the expansion of the bus bike rack project to all TTC routes by 2010, installing a full Bike Station that includes supervised bike parking and change facilities at Union Station as part of its reconstruction and by providing enhanced bike parking such as bike lockers or bike stations at all TTC subway stations and transit hubs by 2010.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build links between cycling and transit

Do you support funding the following programs to build links between cycling and transit?

  • Funding the expansion of the bus bike rack project to all TTC routes by 2010
  • Providing enhanced Bike Parking or Bike Stations at all TTC subway stations and transit hubs by 2010
  • Installing a full Bike Station that includes supervised bike parking, change facilities and other services at Union Station as part of its reconstruction.

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Having visited Amsterdam on a number of occasions I can only say positive things for the benefits of integrating bicycles with public transit. Having secure bike parking facilities at transit stations is an extremely sound idea. If we can agree that park-and-ride parking lots are a good idea, then secure bike parking facilities are an even better one. Not only is the space needed to provide the facilities far more efficient than providing a parking lot, but the economic reality of many TTC riders is that many cannot afford a car, but could much more easily afford a bike. If people were able to fill the gaps in the TTC’s bus service by riding their bikes to the nearest subway, then it would reduce congestion and frustration on all sides. Transit and cycling should be friends, not enemies. And those who own cars would have more incentive to leave their cars at home and take the better way.
 

14. Improving road maintenance in curb lanes and bike lanes

Cycling is a year-round mode of transportation. The hazards that cyclists face on the road vary according to the season. In the spring potholes in the road make navigating bike lanes and the curb lane tricky, in the summer and fall it is dirt and debris that accumulate along the curb, in the winter snow piles up in the bike lanes. The City of Toronto needs to give priority to routine maintenance in the bike lanes and curb lanes of the road where cyclists ride.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Improve Maintenance

Do you support prioritizing routine maintenance in high volume cycling corridors such as road patching, street cleaning and snow removal from bike lanes?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: It is said that in many European cities, the bike paths are the first to be cleared of snow. In Toronto, it is where we pile the snow. This is very telling of our current attitude towards cyclists. Obviously we need to have a councilor that actually rides a bike regularly to address policies which are oblivious to the needs of cyclists. Not only do I ride a bike, but I have a solution to cyclist’s perennial problems with potholes in the road, dirt and debris that accumulate along the curb etc. That solution is the raised bike lane (http://www.oniszczak.com/index.html#1). There will be no dirt and debris to accumulate on the bike lane since the bike lane is at the same level as the sidewalk. The curb with it’s associated dirt and debris will remain on the road out of harm’s way. And since the bike lane will be built of the same materials (or similar) to the sidewalk, there will be no potholes. Bike lanes are too important to be simply a line painted on the road.
 

15. Promoting cycling as safe, sustainable transportation.

The Toronto Bike Plan in 2001 recommended several new programs to promote cycling and provide cycling education and safety programs to cyclists. However, City Council has not yet increased the budget for these programs. The Toronto Bike Plan 3 year Implementation Strategy report (2005) stated that a doubling of staff was needed to implement the programs recommended. To do this would require adding $270,000 to the Planning Division’s cycling programs budget.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Promote - Increase funding for cycling safety, education and promotion programs

Do you support doubling the funding for the Cycling Safety Education and Promotion programs offered by the City of Toronto by adding $270,000 to that budget?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: There is nothing more important than the safety and health of our citizens and I am a believer allocating resources towards education. Since the Cycling Safety Education and Promotion programs involve both, I deem it a worthy program.
 

16. Implementing the recommendations of the Regional Coroner’s Report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto (1998)

In 1988 the Regional Coroner published a report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto. It made a number of recommendations to improve the safety of cyclists most of which have yet to be implemented. Some of these require the cooperation of the Federal and Provincial governments but others are under the jurisdiction of the City. The Mayor and Councillors need to ensure that the city implements these recommendations. They also need to demand that the province and federal governments follow up on the recommendations that apply to them.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Protect - Implement recommendations of Coroner’s Report

Do you support implementing the recommendations of the Regional Coroner’s Report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto (1998) that apply to the City of Toronto and working with the Provincial and Federal Governments to ensure that they do the same?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Yes, in addition, I propose the raised bike lane (http://www.oniszczak.com/index.html#1) as a concrete, proven and low cost way of improving bicycle safety in Toronto.
 

17. Increasing funding to build the Bikeway Network

Construction of the Bikeway network has lagged well behind the schedule set out in the Toronto Bike Plan. Part of the reason is that capital funding has been less than half of what was recommended in the Bike Plan. The Toronto Bike Plan 3 Year Implementation Strategy that was presented to Works Committee in August 2005 sets out a budget plan to get the Bikeway Network construction back on track. To see the bike plan implemented Council needs to approve these budget amounts and ensure that the requisite staff are in place to work on implementing these projects.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build the Bikeway Network

Do you support adding 285 kilometers to the Bikeway Network by 2010 by supporting the budgets outlined below?

YesNoNo
Answer
 Transportation ServicesParks Forestry and Recreation
YearkmCycling Infrastructure (millions) kmBikeway Network Expansion Trails and Pathways State of Good Repair Bikeway Network** PF&R Total (millions)
200735$6.0*8$845,000$655,000$1.50
200860$6.2*8$895,000$655,000$1.55
200968$7.89$990,000$610,000$1.60
201072$9.210$810,000$790,000$1.65
*Toronto Bike Plan - 3 year implementation Strategy (2005) recommendation
**State of Good Repair trail upgrades
Comments:
 

18. Increasing staffing to build the Bikeway Network

The Toronto Bike Plan recommends increasing the level of funding available for building cycling infrastructure. This will require a corresponding increase in the level of staff time to plan, design and implement these projects. Part of the reason that there has been a backlog of bike lane projects is the shortage of staff to work on them. To get these projects back on track the City of Toronto needs to dedicate more staff to building the Bikeway Network.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build - Increase staffing

Do you support increasing the number of staff working on planning designing and implementing cycling infrastructure by:

  • adding 4 staff to the Transportation Services division to work on cycling infrastructure.
  • adding a senior position of Cycling and Pathways Planner to the Parks Forestry and Recreation Division

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Obviously a backlog is not a benefit for anyone and a remedy is required to get on track.
 

19. Cycling infrastructure projects in Ward 13

Active Transportation requires a network of bike lanes and paths that span the city. To enable this to happen each Councillor needs to support the projects proposed for their ward, and work to ensure they are approved and built in the year that they have been proposed for construction by city staff. Transportation Services staff have proposed projects for 2006, 2007 and 2008. Projects for 2009 and 2010 have not been determined yet. They will be selected from the list of projects marked TBD(to be determined). Each of the bike lane projects will have to go through a bike lane approval process that includes consultation with the community.
More info: TCAT - Ward 13 Information

The bike lane projects proposed for your ward are listed below. Do you support the following projects? (Indicate by typing ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ into the support box for each project.)

Support
Yes/No
StreetFromToTypekmYear
YESAnnetteKeeleJaneBike Lane2.12006
YESDundas WestHumber RiverHumbercrestBike Lane0.9TBD
YESBloorHumber RiverSouth KingswayBike Lane0.5TBD
YESBloor*South KingswayKeeleBike Lane2.2TBD
Comment:
 
Candidate Lists
Mayoral Candidates:All   Survey Complete
Council Candidates by Ward (Numerical):All   Survey Complete
Council Candidates by Ward (Alpha):All
Mayoral and CouncilAll
School Trustee Candidates by School Board and Ward:All   Survey Complete


Not logged in  log in
bikeToronto - Latest Toronto Cycling News Toronto Coalition for Active Transportation Toronto Coalition for Active Transportation